Thursday, June 30, 2005

Freedom on the March!

Not about to be outdone by a bunch of Canucks, Spain has legalized gay marriage:
Spain's lower house of parliament has voted in favour of allowing gay couples to marry and adopt children.

The controversial decision overrules last week's rejection of the bill by the upper house, the Senate.

The bill will become law in a month's time, making Spain Europe's third nation after the Netherlands and Belgium to allow same sex marriages.

Polls suggest most Spaniards back the move, although two weeks ago thousands joined a Madrid rally against the bill.

So, how long will it be until the US can be counted alongside Spain and Canada and the Netherlands in the "pro-freedom" column, rather than grouped with the likes of Iran and Saudi Arabia?

UPDATE: I didn't notice that Moses had posted something similar until just now. Well, great minds and all that.

Wingnut Catchphrase Watch

Remember "Dred Scott" being code for abortion? I think I found a new one:

"those who believe that the Constitution is a living, breathing document."

That's a pretty unwieldy phrase, yes? Yet I've now seen this exact construction in print twice in the last week (most recently here) and heard it used once on talk radio.

I know it's a subtle way to slam moderates as the big SCOTUS nomination fight gears up, but if that was the only purpose I find it hard to believe that they would all use this exact wording.

Any suggestions on what else it might mean? Stem Cell research must be stopped, maybe? Paul is dead, perhaps? Let's hear your thoughts.

UPDATE: Ooops! "Dred Scott" not "Dread Scott". He wasn't a Rastafarian.

Never Trust A Commie

How did a New England Patriots Super Bowl ring end up in the Kremlin library?
During a press conference Saturday at Konstantinovsky Palace near St. Petersburg with other American corporate executives, Kraft showed Putin the 4.94-carat ring. Smiling, Putin tried it on, placed it in his pocket, and soon left.

Kraft now says that he meant for Putin to keep the ring.

We all know that Massachusetts is the most liberal state in the US. I think I finally understand how the so called "Patriots" keep winning the Super Bowl. Could the KGB be behind it? Is there any truth to the rumor that they are about to change their name to the New England "Comrades"? Developing...

Quote of the Day

From the Strib


As for Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and others like him, the U.S. Marshals Service should march up to Capitol Hill and arrest them for sedition. Plain and simple, they are giving aid and comfort to the enemy.


Do I really need to say anything here?

Oh What a Beautiful Morning!

The Sponges are on their way to O-K-L-A-H-O-M-A, OKLAHOMA!, and the Powerliberals are going to be doing a bit of sittin' over in Peasantland. They will, of course, be getting the porterhouse that is our A game. You will be getting the weinie roast left over. Kidding, we shall not evolve into PowerSponges.

Actually, I'm looking forward to blogsitting. I'm a fan of matching the original as much as possible, so I think it will require quite a bit of Mitchitude. For a week, I think I can do it. Luckily, he gets home just in time for my next sitting job.

Speaking of sitters, MNObserver is being brilliant over on the Eye. I think we may need to offer her a permanent home once the ASE returns.

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

No Statement Left Behind

Via DvK, Kennedy took an opportunity to remind us where he stands.

Firmly ensconced on the Presidential Derriere.

Navel-Gazing Moment

Happy 10,000th visitor!

I'll buy the first pitcher tonight.

*sigh* I remember when it was just me, Smartie, and the next blog clickers in here.

Inadvertently, I owe it all to you.

By The Way

It's already old news to the blogosphere, but I'd be remiss if I didn't say this.

Congratulations to our neighbors to the North for being the first country in this hemisphere to legalize gay marriage. Now, when their society fails to implode, perhaps we can start having reasonable discussions about it on this side of the border.

An Antidote to Last Nights Speech

"Bombing a sovereign nation for ill-defined reasons with vague objectives undermines the American stature in the world. The international respect and trust for America has diminished every time we casually let the bombs fly."

Who said it? Some godless unpatriotic liberal, right? Wrong:

-Representative Tom Delay (R-TX)

The Republic of Dogs has posted a list of quotes from various Republicans attacking President Clinton, demoralizing our troops and giving aid and comfort to our enemies in Kosovo. Hypocrites. Go check out the full list.

Found via The Poor Man

Two Days Till Government Shutdown

Do you know where your beer is at?

Drinking Liberally

When, Tonight 6-9 pm
Where, Lyle's 2021 Hennepin Avenue South, Back Room

Presidential Speech, the Aftermath

Some say brilliant. Some say not so much.

I say that it's time we break it down to simple middle school Mash Notes. People like things simple.

Dear America,

Do you like me?

Check one:


Yes

No

Maybe


Love, President Bush

Forget It

I wanted to rant and rave over the latest state budget idiocy, but I just can't bring myself to do it. I wanted to take the state DFL to task for what looks like capitulation just so that they can keep racino off the table. Was racino ever really on the table? Is this really the most important issue of the day? Forget it. You lost me. You had the ear of the State for the last month. You had the perfect opportunity to lay out some sensible budget proposals and you failed. You didn't even try. Careful watchers of state politics know that T.Paw, who has tied the rudder of State with his no new taxes pledge, was the one driving us onto the rocks. You could have made that plain to even casual observers. But you didn't. You could have tried to steer the State forward, but you didn't. Why should I care about you?

And to the MN Republican party I have nothing but disgust for you. Hole in the budget? Build a casino! Need more money? Just assume the casino is going to bring in more money! Still don't have enough cash? Pass bonding bills and worry about paying for it later. Or better yet, just shift the burden onto the municipal governments and force them to raise property taxes. Hey, at least your hands are clean, right? When your ultimate vision for this State is to turn us into the wettest Dakota you don't deserve to be taken seriously, much less be in office.

This state used to be founded on some kind of progressive principles of sharing the burden and sharing the wealth. Now it's everyone for themselves and screw you if you don't like it.

I've got nothing here. No one will benefit from this mess, least of all the people of this State.

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Presidential Address

Huh.

When Tim Russert said before the speech that President Bush would link Iraq to September 11th, I thought he meant factually, not as a rhetorical device.

NBC said that it was meantioned 5 times in the body.

Also interesting is that according to NBC, the networks were originally turning down showing this was because they thought it would be more appropriate for him to do the address in the Oval Office.

Live Yowling here.

UPDATE: An NBC reporter at the scene just stated that the applause outburst was actually started by the people on the President's staff and was "contagious." White House Applause Board lit, Moses.

A CWFA Two-fer

That is the sound of the good Dr. spinning in his grave.

My personal choice for his most important book for our times: Horton Hears a Who. Remember that miniscule town named Who-ville facing certain destruction because it was too small to be seen? But when Horton heard one of Who-ville’s tiny spokesmen appeal for help, he decided:

"I'll just have to save him. Because, after all, A person's a person, no matter how small."

I wonder what Dr. Seuss would have thought of today's stem-cell debate.

Not since the successful campaign to legalize abortion on demand has there been such an angry chorus ready to snuff out small life. The imaginary Who's had voices. Human embryos can speak only through us. Our Horton-esque mission is clear: With reason and compassion, to paint the clearest, truest picture possible of the humanity of the embryo.



FYI - His widow does not approve of this type of Seuss-age.

Also, don't forget to read about Medical Ethics Day at the Capital, where they cover everything except diagnosis via video-tape.

Countdown to Prime Time

Via Yahoo:


By a narrow margin, the public continues to think the war has not been worth the cost and bigger majorities fear that Iraq has crippled the ability of the United States to respond to conflicts elsewhere in the world and has damaged efforts to recruit young people into the military. A large majority, about six in 10 people, say the United States is "bogged down" in Iraq.


Overwhelming majorities of Americans think the Bush administration and U.S. military leaders fundamentally underestimated the difficulty of the war and failed to anticipate the tenacity of the insurgency in Iraq.

Don't Blame Me

I don't have cable.

Via Students for Bachmann.

A City of One's Own

We now have a chick in each race. Where's my female gubernatorial candidate?
(PS - Thanks, Eva)

Elizabeth Dickinson for Mayor

For Immediate Release June 28, 2005

ACTIVIST ELIZABETH DICKINSON ENTERS SAINT PAUL MAYOR'S RACE

Saint Paul - Activist and former city council candidate Elizabeth
Dickinson announces her candidacy for Mayor of Saint Paul at a press conference here today; the event takes place on the blufftop along Prospect St., with the city skyline across the Mississippi as a backdrop, at 11:00 a.m. She will be introduced
both by Minneapolis City Councilmember Dean Zimmerman, and by Jane Prince,
who is aide to Saint Paul City Councilmember Jay Benanav.

Dickinson is a founder of the Clean Energy Now coalition which
successfully pushed for conversion of Xcel Energy's urban High Bridge
and Riverside power plants from coal to gas -- two of only five such
conversions nationally to date -- and the installation of pollution
controls on the larger A.S. King plant near Stillwater. She has also
been highly visible as a spokesperson on other issues: she narrated and
coproduced widely-distributed videos on Wal-Mart and on AIDS, as well
as
one on the power plant conversion. She is leaving her position as
Community Affairs Manager and lobbyist for the Minnesota AIDS Project
(MAP) to enter the race.

Dickinson’s campaign will focus on city government collaboration with
Saint Paul's neighborhoods --especially cooperation with the city's District Councils -- and honoring the voices of individual citizens; on environmental and clean energy issues including the opportunity to give Saint Paul a national profile as a
clean-energy leader; on firmly establishing the city's current living
wage policy as a requirement for businesses seeking significant financial help -- such as tax-increment financing -- from city government; and on vigorously supporting small businesses, which create over 75% of new American jobs. A Co-Chair of
the Green Party of Saint Paul, a boardmember of the West Side Citizens’
Organization and of Clean Water Action, and a member of the Saint Paul
Bill of Rights Defense Committee, Dickinson has worked tirelessly with
numerous like-minded groups and individuals to maintain city
environmental standards, back the INS/Police Separation Ordinance and
the Code for Corporate Responsibility, and work for Instant Runoff
Voting and other progressive causes.

Dickinson's motivation for running includes a strong awareness that
many Saint Paul voters have beendismayed by the absence to date of a strong progressive voice in the mayoral contest.

"I've had people come up to me and ask if I'm running, because they don't feel they're represented by either of the current candidates," she says. "Many of
them became very excited when I began privately telling people I had
decided to run." She felt strongly enough about the need to give voters
a real choice, she says, that she was willing to risk her household's
primary income by leaving her job at MAP.

Her campaign will lean heavily on the grassroots outreach Dickinson
strongly believes in -- in her 2003 Ward 2 race for city council, she nearly took the second spot in the open primary by knocking on nearly every single-family door in the
ward, while spending less than 20% of the eventual winner’s total campaign outlay -- and less than 10% of the budget of the ultimate runner-up. Saint Paulites can expect
to become familiar with her face, as Dickinson anticipates knocking on doors in every city ward before the September 13 primary.

CONTACT:

Elizabeth Dickinson, (651) 235-1208 (cell)
Christopher Childs, Communications Manager, (651) 312-1216

Elizabeth Dickinson for Mayor ~ 384 Hall Avenue ~ Saint Paul, MN ~ 55107

###

Monday, June 27, 2005

Heh

Via Shakespeare's Sister, I have to wonder if they're putting the band in the wrong place.

Home is Where the Blog Is

Smartie and I have returned home tired, a little sunburned, and ready to get back to the real world. Three days of flashbulbs makes rew something something....

The kittens didn't vomit once while we were gone, and appeared to be much better behaved than Sponge's nasty felines from Friday. I will let you blogsit, but stay away from my cats, please.

MNObserver appears to have kept you all in line as well, for which I am quite pleased. I shall be purchasing her a whip to be awarded at Lyle's next week.

Nebraska is an interesting place right now. I saw no tv, little newspaper, and nearly all of my news over the weekend came from listening to bad talk radio. Inside the Beltway celebrated their 25th anniversary radio broadcast on Sunday. Some guy who was sitting in for Laura Ingram was explaining to me that Karl Rove is a genius fisherman, pulling liberals in hook line and sinker with his therapy quote this week. Some one else sitting in for Rush Limbaugh took three hours Thursday explaining that the Supreme Court just declared all churches are now going to be mowed down to make malls for the state of California. We turned the radio off once Smartie caught himself agreeing with something Bill O'Reilly was saying. Nothing like four days of Bible Belt radiowaves to make Mr. Bill almost look sane.

Tomorrow night, President Bush will be taking up some primetime airwaves to talk about Iraq. After listening to Rumsfeld explain that there is no military shortage, and they can recruit forever, I'm anxious to hear what the President has to say. I will drinking beer and muttering to myself, possibly at Keegans, if they are going to show it. Let me know if you would like to join me, Democrat and Republican alike. At this point, I just want some informed conversation, I don't care what side you take. Too much talk radio makes me desperate for two sided conversations.

Thank you to our guests, and feel free to pop back in when you have the time. If you post something amazing, I may even give you a picture of me in my bubblegum pink bridesmaid's dress.

Welcome Back to the Power Liberals

Thanks again for letting me guest blog on your site. I'm sure that everyone is looking forward to the traditional version of Friday Cat Blogging to reappear. I hope you had a good trip and it was a pleasure guestblogging with MN Observer.

Thanks for putting up with me and come check out the always underachieving CP.

Happy Katherine Visits Club Gitmo

Happy Katherine's entire career rests on the hope that her readers must suffer from some form of attention deficit disorder. There is no other way to explain this:

In all the din, one vital voice has been missing -- that of ordinary soldiers who have served at Guantanamo. Most of these first-hand observers have had no way to add their eyewitness accounts to the debate.
Followed by this:

Hegseth himself did not participate in interrogations and has no personal knowledge of what the base was like before his arrival. However, during his tenure, he saw detainees on a daily basis and never witnessed any evidence that interrogations are inhumane or violent.
I do not doubt for a single second that 2nd Lt Hegseth and his fellow Guardsmen had anything but the best interests of their prisoners in mind. I really don't. Our military takes great care in its precision and effectiveness; mistreatment of prisoners does not factor into either of these objectives. During my time as an Air Force intel-analyst, I was trained to minimize collateral damage; I put precision bombs on target. I completely understand the great amount of care that everyday airmen, soldiers, seamen and Marines put into making sure that no one gets hurt who doesn't need to get hurt. Why do we do this? Because we are honorable and good, we are the best military on the planet, we have the highest standards and we strive for excellence in all we do.

What I don't get is the mistaken belief that physical proximity equals intimate knowledge in the eyes of someone looking to score a political victory by offering a uniformed soldier as evidence of otherwise undistinguished Republican talking points.

Through Kersten, we learn that Lt Hegseth believes that Newsweek is responsible for 15 deaths because of its Qur'an story; e learn that he subscribes to Duncan Hunter's overview of Gitmo cuisine; he even tells us about the white gloves and the Qur'an. My heavens, where have we heard these before? What sort of additional weight is added by the transmission through military lips? Who knew that Happy Katherine was an alchemist?

Following the recital of Republican Gitmo talking points by the good Lt who has no first hand knowledge of the interrogations, we are treated to this Happy Katherine gem:

In the end, some of the shrillest critics of American defense policy are probably not especially interested in Guantanamo as such, but see it as a convenient opportunity to criticize an institution of which they are deeply suspicious -- the American military -- and to cast doubt on the morality of America's war on terror.
You have to be absoloutely shitting me.

So when stuff like this happens, the people who demand accountability are just anti-military political hacks. I get it. If only Happy Katherine were more liberal in her responses to other moral failings.

I mean the power one has, in a world deeply marked by moral relativism, when one knows that some human qualities are noble and others are base, and that we should strive to foster the former and discourage the latter.
Foster or discourage Happy Katherine...foster or discourage.

She leaves us with perhaps the silliest thing ever said about...well, you judge for yourself:

If things are this bad at Gitmo, the reasoning goes, the whole war must be wrong.
I have to say, I thought I had heard it all; WMD, democracy, evil dictator, drawing the terrorists into Iraq and so on and so forth. Nope, those of us against the war have no other matierial to play with. All we have is Gitmo...it is our only hope.

Happy Katherine everyone...give her a hand.

Sunday, June 26, 2005

Tild~'s KoolAid, Condi's Hangover

In March, she issued statements with titles like United States Committed To Empowering Women:

In many Muslim countries, while there is much that remains to be done to improve the situation for women, the bigger picture is one of freedom expanding and surmounting the forces of tyranny, including those that hold women in second-class status. From Jordan and Bahrain, to Iraq and Afghanistan, the world has witnessed elections and expanding roles for women. In the Near East and all around the world, the United States is committed to working in partnerships with other nations to enlarge the freedom and empowerment of women."


Now, we read Rice silent on women’s rights in Middle East:

She may be America’s most powerful woman but Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, made clear during her tour of the Middle East last week that she is not about to become its most outspoken supporter of women’s rights.
During her week-long sweep through Israel, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, Rice steered clear of confrontation over one of the region’s most volatile issues — the role of women in Islamic societies.
"It’s just a line I’ve not wanted to cross,” she replied. “The United States has to recognise that even after democratic processes have taken place, places are not going to look like the United States . . . I think it’s important that we do have some boundaries about what we’re trying to achieve.”


Remember when such rank hypocrisy used to make us mad? I miss those days.

Rew and Smartie return from their trip to wonderful today, so I'm outta here. It's been fun blogging with the famous Mr. Sponge!

Case In Point

From the comments section:

Secure Computing has sold no licenses to any entity in Iran, and any use of Secure's software by an ISP in Iran has been without Secure Computing's consent and is in violation of Secure Computing's End User License Agreement. We have been made aware of ISPs in Iran making illegal and unauthorized attempts to use of our software. Secure Computing is actively taking steps to stop this illegal use of our products. Secure Computing Corporation is fully committed to complying with the export laws, policies and regulations of the United States. It is Secure Computing's policy that strict compliance with all laws and regulations concerning the export and re-export of our products and/or technical information is required. Unless authorized by the U.S. Government, Secure Computing Corporation prohibits export and reexport of Secure products, software, services, and technology to Iran and destinations subject to U.S. embargoes or trade sanctions.

David Burt, Public Relations Manager
Secure Computing®
1-206-336-1541 (Direct Phone)
1-206-683-9508 (Mobile Phone)
1-206-834-1788 (Fax)
David_Burt@Securecomputing.com


Wow, it's almost as if I typed in "democracy" or "freedom". It probably was just "Secure Computing" and "Iran". Excellent job Mr. Burt, I really feel a whole lot better about privacy now. How about this one: "Secure Computing", "crazy", "big brother" and "bullshit".

Gee, what could the Iranian and Chinese possibly want with your product?

I guess ignorance is bliss in a global market.

Saturday, June 25, 2005

Ethical Question

From the AP::

NEW YORK (AP) -- The Iranian government has tightened its control over the Internet, increasingly blocking content in its national language of Farsi and restricting what citizens can publish through Web journals, Western researchers say.
This is similar to recent news from China:

China, too, has placed special emphasis on its own language. Users of Microsoft Corp.'s new blog service in China get a scolding message when they use such words as "democracy," "freedom" and "human rights." Anti-censorship activists have found that if a user creates the blog in English, it bypasses such filtering, even if it is later switched to Chinese.
The report concerning Iranian internet filtration can be found here.

What were some of the major findings of the report?

-- Iran uses the commercial filtering package SmartFilter – made by the U.S.-based company, Secure Computing – as the primary technical engine of its filtering system. This commercial software product is configured as part of the Iranian filtering system to block both internationally-hosted sites in English and locally hosted sites in local languages.

-- Of the sites tested, approximately 34 percent were blocked. The Iranian state has effectively blocked access of its citizens to many pornographic online sites, most anonymizer tools, a large number of sites with gay and lesbian content, some politically sensitive sites, women's rights sites, and certain targeted Web logs ("blogs"), among other types of sites.
OK, the ethical question here is should companies like Secure Computing and Microsoft be held accountable for the anti-democratic use of their products?

This question is far different than the phrase often used by pro-gun advocates: It's not the gun company's fault...it's the criminal that shoots the gun. Why is it different?

Where is the line between oppressing citizens with billy clubs and bullets and oppression via the electronic suppression of the free exchange of ideas? Are we not fighing a war of ideas for the "Arab Street"? How can we export democracy when our very own companies are exporting products that are overtly used to stifle democracy?

The question here deals with the proper and intended use of a product (allowing someone to filter internet content)...not the abuse of a product (killing someone with a gun). What else are radical Islamic governments going to do with filtering software? What could a commmunist government possibly want with a product that allows it to target key words like "democracy", "freedom", and "human rights"?

Question: Is it ethical for companies like Microsoft and Secure Computing be allowed to sell these types of products to countries like Iran and China? What responsibility do they have if one of their products is used to identify a dissident? What if this dissident is killed? Why do we accept it when our companies (big citizens) contribute to anti-democratic actions?

This is not a "corporations are evil" sort of thing. Should anyone be allowed to do this? I don't think so.

Why We Can't Be Completely Serious About National Security

I'm not talking about "we" as in us liberal bloggers, I'm talking about "we", as in we Americans. Why can't we be completely serious about national security? Take the F-22 for example:

The F-22 is the Air Force's next generation fighter. It has stealth capability, it can fly above the speed of sound without afterburners and it is an all around kick-ass airplane.

More importantly, our current air-domination airframe (the F-15) is falling behind Europe's and Russia's newest class of fighters (which are set to roll off production lines by 2005.) These new fighters include the French Rafale, Europe's Eurofighter and the Russian SU-35.

The military is also developing a new fighter called the F-35, or the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). The contract for the JSF is the single largest military contract in the history of the world: Possibly reaching all the way up to $200 billion (with a "b").

Here is a little ditty about the F-35:

The first operational Joint Strike Fighter, now designated as the F-35, is scheduled for delivery in fiscal 2008. The F-35 is actually a family of three aircraft designed to replace aircraft in the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and the British military. A total of 2,852 planes scheduled for delivery starting in 2008 for the US Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and a small number to the British Royal Navy. Other nations interested in participating in the program include the Netherlands, Belgium and Norway.

Plans call for the F-35 to be the world's premier strike aircraft through 2040, Aldridge said. "It will provide air- to-air capability second only to the F-22 air superiority fighter," he said. The plane will allow the Air Force forces to field an almost all-stealth fighter force by 2025. The Navy and Marine variants will be the first deployment of an "all-aspect" stealth airplane.

Pretty f-ing cool. Pretty f-ing close to the F-22. Pretty f-ing more versitile than the F-22. The F-35 can land on aircraft carriers, can take of vertically and can take of conventionaly.

Do you know that the USAF has made a calculation that each F-22 has the value of a 6 F-16s. In order to pay for such an expensive plane, the USAF has to retire roughly 6 F-16's for every F-22 they take on board. The USAF will begin to cannibalize its F-16 force in the year 2007. The last of the 300+ F-22's is scheduled to be delivered sometime after 2011 (that is if they don't keep crashing.)

What does this mean in plain english? The USAF is floating a loan on the number of airframes in their arsenal between the years of 2007-2011 (maybe longer).

I recently made a post about China and their increased military and economic presence in Asia. What happens if China makes a pass at Taiwan during these years? What happens if the DPRK makes a run for Pusan? While the Al Qaeda Air Force is lacking, sooner or later we will have to face an army that has more and better technology than Jihad Battle Donkeys.

Why do we continue to pour money into the F-22 program when the JSF is more versatile? Why do we continue to spend away on a plane that requires us to canibalize our current stock of airframes (and thus sacrificing national security) for a period of 4 years...possibly more?

Well, each F-22 costs over $250 million per airframe and have contractors in 43 states. Plain and simple. It's a cash cow in nearly every state in the union. Good for business...not so much for national security.

This is not to say that all military contracts are bad things. This is not true. All this means is that parochial financial concerns DO NOT equal national security concerns; every state has a military widgit to sell...we don't need them all.

As a Twins fan, it's too bad that we can't figure out some sort of way to make the proposed stadium have some sort of dual-use military purpose; maybe we could put AAA in the right field bleachers. That way we could pretend that it would be for "national security" and we could give it all the welfare it needed...hell, we could even get a roof.

Back From the Dead and Bigger Than Ever

There are things in modern American life you can expect. Never-ending taxpayer-supported stadium proposals are near the top of the list. Like small children who cannot take “no” for an answer, the proponents of these boondoggles think they’ll wear us out, and they frequently do.  If they can’t do that, they’ll trick you.  Or guilt you or pretend they love you Mommy more than anything else if only they could have a cookie, just this once and they’ll never ask again.  Every parent knows what to do here, but legislators seem unwilling to learn.

After telling us (in January) they weren’t going to be seeking any state help in building a stadium this year, lo and behold, at the very last moment possible during the regular session, the Minnesota Twins and their minions pulled a horrible proposal out of the back room and tried to run with it. The thought was that if they acted quickly, they could get what they wanted (like the repeal of that pesky law requiring a referendum) before an organized resistance could emerge.

Well, things didn’t work out that way, and now we’re deep into special session territory, and not even these people are stupid enough to suggest that the legislature set aside the shutdown machinations to deal with a little billionaire welfare, so it’s on hold for the moment.  But keep an eye out for the end-session equivalent of an October Surprise, with the bill swooping out of nowhere for a vote as fast as the blink of an eye. Sort of like a tornado on a summer night, except they’re planning on turning the sirens off so you don’t know it’s coming.

An unlikely alliance of John Marty, Phil Krinke, Dan Dobson, Ben Goldfarb and even occasionally that handsome David Strom (when he thinks some of his handlers aren't watching) have some common sense proposals ready to run with as the showdown draws near. While following the law, telling us where the money goes, not taxing for thirty years on a stadium they’ll declare obsolete before it’s built (read: retractable roof) are all things any taxpayer wants to see, that's not Mr. Pohlad's plan.

But one thing’s for certain: just like when he played a central role in destroying the Twin Cities Streetcar system by helping loot its treasury and infrastructure, Carl Pohlad is playing the populace for suckers one more time. This time, though, it’s going to come out of nowhere in the middle of the night.

Friday, June 24, 2005

Clueless Rotarians

Here.

"Now we have to accept the fact that the U.S. is a torturing society."

All Seeing Eye points out the Times Story about the role of doctors in assisting in the torture at Gitmo. Locally, Dr. Steven Miles, former U.S. Senate candidate, has been asking questions about this all along:

Miles argues that health professionals turned a blind eye, or worse, to the torture and deaths of some of their patients. "These health professionals could have protested," he said. Instead, "the medical system here became one of the professional arms of a torturing society."

His allegations -- first published in a medical journal last summer -- have infuriated the Pentagon. "We have no evidence that military medical personnel collaborated with interrogators or guards accused or suspected of detainee abuse, or condoned abusive behavior," said James Turner, a spokesman for the Defense Department in Washington

Miles, though, says the evidence tells another story.


The United States Military responded exactly as we've grown to expect, stating in a manner that would make Karl Rove proud that truth-telling is a dishonor to the troops.

The Pentagon responded with an indignant letter to the medical journal, accusing Miles of denigrating "the honorable, and sometimes heroic, efforts of the military medical system ..."


Nevermind the fact that Dr. Miles is a medical ethicist. Nevermind that he once spent months working with torture victims in southeast Asia in the 1970s as medical director of the American Refugee Committee, and knows torture when he sees it. Nevermind that he still volunteers at the Center for Victims of Torture in Minneapolis. Nevermind that interrogators themselves have said the military doctors' role was to advise them and their fellow interrogators on ways of increasing psychological duress on detainees. Dr. Miles told an inconvenient truth, and watch what is going to happen to him as he publishes his book asking more questions and revealing more inconvenient truths.

Friday Cat Bloggin'

My little kitties aren't as well behaved as the Power Liberals' are...

Here's Mr. Bubbles, Sunny, and Peachmuffin doing some blow on the kitchen table:

kitty1

Here's Mr. Bubbles running with scissors:

kitty2

Here's Sunny vomiting in the toilet after a long night of eight-balls, crystal meth, and sex with wool hats:

kitty3

I don't even want to know what this is:

kitty4

Bad kitties.

While We All Bitch About Dick Durbin...

...the real world chugs on:

SHANGHAI, Thursday, June 23 - One of China's largest state-controlled oil companies made a $18.5 billion unsolicited bid Thursday for Unocal, signaling the first big takeover battle by a Chinese company for an American corporation.

The bold bid, by the China National Offshore Oil Corporation ( CNOOC), may be a watershed in Chinese corporate behavior, and it demonstrates the increasing influence on Asia of Wall Street's bare-knuckled takeover tactics.

The offer is also the latest symbol of China's growing economic power and of the soaring ambitions of its corporate giants, particularly when it comes to the energy resources it needs desperately to continue feeding its rapid growth.
Maybe Hugh Hewitt will spend 4 radio programs on this subject...something that actually has long-term repercussions.

Here's some food for thought:

An annual CIA global intelligence assessment has for the first time since 9/11 characterized China's military buildup as a threat to the United States. "Improved Chinese capabilities threaten U.S. forces in the region," CIA director Porter Goss told a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee Wednesday.

"China is increasingly confident and active on the international stage, trying to ensure that it has a voice on international issues and secures access to natural resources and to counter what it sees as United States' efforts to contain or encircle it."

"If Beijing decides that Taiwan is taking steps toward permanent separation that exceeds Beijing's tolerance, we assess China is prepared to respond with varying levels of force," Goss told the committee.
Go ahead...continue with the Nazi talk.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

Stuck On Auto-Pilot

Sometimes, we just have our mind made up about things. Take Shot in the Dark for example:


One of the lefty memes that's made me shake my head in mute, tired dejection has been "We were wrong to disband the Iraqi military". The meme was in full, depraved glory last night on the Hewitt show, when a caller claimed that we could have used the Hussein's Republican Guard as a police force.

<> Who are these people? < / Seinfeld off>
Summary: Mitch disagrees with it so it must be either "liberal", "lefty" or "moonbatish". But is it?


The British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, says it had been a mistake to disband the Iraqi army completely, after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime.

The Prime Minister was speaking in Brighton on the eve of the annual conference of his ruling Labour Party.

Mr Blair rejected claims that the US-led coalition was ill-prepared after the war, but says at the time there was enormous pressure to act.

"I do accept that there was probably one, as I've said before, one error that was made, which is that, I think in retrospect, to disband the Iraqi Army in its entirety and to 'de-Baath-ify', in other words to remove all elements of the Baath Party from positions of authority in Iraq was done too quickly," he said.

Here's more of the same from Chuck Hagel.

Best of all, here's Powerline displaying their moonbatish tendencies in a summary of the "Republican/conservative" argument against Rummy (to be competely forthright, Powerline appears to take the pro-disbanding position later on in the post; this quote is their summary of conservative postitions on the matter):


The Republican/conservative case against Rumsfeld is based on specific decisions with which he is associated, such as troop levels and "disbanding" the Iraqi army, and on procurement issues.
Ah yes, a "lefty meme".

Flash back to the week of December 20th, 2004. This is the date when the call for Rumsfeld's resignation really hit stride (italics are mine).


Of acute concern, senators from both parties said, was the failure to more quickly and effectively train Iraqi security personnel, a situation the senators said had been seriously aggravated by an early decision by the United States to disband the Iraqi Army in the immediate aftermath of Saddam Hussein's ouster.

Most importantly, Mitch completely ignores the actions of Paul Bremer following his decision to disband the Iraqi army (italics are mine):

Seven months after the fall of Baghdad, a single Iraqi army battalion exists to reinforce overstretched U.S.-led occupation troops. As casualties climb and large foreign armies remain on the sidelines, U.S. authorities are racing to recruit a credible Iraqi force to bolster the authority of a future Baghdad government.

Before the war, President Bush approved a plan that would have put several hundred thousand Iraqi soldiers on the U.S. payroll and kept them available to provide security, repair roads and prepare for unforeseen postwar tasks. But that project was stopped abruptly in late May by L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, who ordered the demobilization of Iraq's entire army, including largely apolitical conscripts.

Bremer reversed himself a month later, but by then the occupation had lost not merely time and momentum but also credibility among former soldiers and their families, an important segment of Iraq's population.
That's right, President Bush supported a plan for the retention of Iraqi soldiers. What is also notable is that Bremer quickly reversed his decision to disband the Iraqi army. Now, he can say that disbanding the Iraqi army was the right thing to do until he is blue in the face...the fact remains he reversed this "good decision" within a single month.

Instead of simply making his argument with historical analogies and case studies (a good argument--which he eventually does), Mitch leads with his chin by qualifying his disagreement as having something to do with a liberal/leftist position. Therefore, the rest of his post--and subsequent disagreement--is based on a needlessly false premise: That the disagreement is with liberals. Anything written after this premise is simply pointed in the wrong direction. Instead of asking "What is wrong with this issue", his question is "Who are these people?"

You may have a good answer...too bad it's for the wrong question.

Can this statement:

One of the lefty memes that's made me shake my head in mute, tired dejection has been "We were wrong to disband the Iraqi military".
...be any more bafoonish? It is unlikely.

So remember this the next time you read Shot in the Dark: If Mitch disagrees with something...maybe it's just because it's liberal. And where's the objectivism in that?

Rew may be a cat person..

...But I'm not:

A 10-year-old boy was in critical condition today after being attacked by a tiger and a lion in Morrison County in central Minnesota on Wednesday night.

Russell LaLa of Royalton was injured when he and his father visited Chuck Mock, the owner of 11 large cats.

Mock, the owner of Best Buy Auto near Little Falls, opened the door of a cage and a tiger pushed its way out to attack the boy. Morrison County Sheriff Michel Wetzel said that when the owner was pulling off the tiger, a lion bit Russell, sometime around 10:43 p.m.

The boy was being treated today at the Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis after being initially transported to St. Gabriel's Hospital in Little Falls.

A family spokesman, who declined to give his name, said Russell was in stable condition in the pediatric intensive care unit at HCMC. He declined say anything further beyond asking that people pray for the boy.

Wetzel said Mock has registered 12 animals with the state — 11 large cats and one bear. The sheriff said he thought Mock kept the animals as "a novelty.''

"I don't think anyone should have them,'' Wetzel said of the exotic animals. "Just because you're legal doesn't mean you're safe.''

Mock did not immediately return telephone calls to his home and office today.

Why Does The CIA Hate America?

From the NY Times (italics are mine):

WASHINGTON, June 21 - A new classified assessment by the Central Intelligence Agency says Iraq may prove to be an even more effective training ground for Islamic extremists than Afghanistan was in Al Qaeda's early days, because it is serving as a real-world laboratory for urban combat.

The assessment, completed last month and circulated among government agencies, was described in recent days by several Congressional and intelligence officials. The officials said it made clear that the war was likely to produce a dangerous legacy by dispersing to other countries Iraqi and foreign combatants more adept and better organized than they were before the conflict.
OK Republicans, I know that at this point you are thinking, "What Would Assrocket Do?" (WWAD) Would he say that this report just proves that Bush was right? After all, they are attacking us in Baghdad, not Bloomington (Camp Snoopy must be protected; we must keep it open.) Maybe he would say that the report wasn't properly vetted; he's big on fake memos...yeah, that's what he would do!
Congressional and intelligence officials who described the assessment called it a thorough examination that included extensive discussion of the areas that might be particularly prone to infiltration by combatants from Iraq, either Iraqis or foreigners.

They said the assessment had argued that Iraq, since the American invasion of 2003, had in many ways assumed the role played by Afghanistan during the rise of Al Qaeda during the 1980's and 1990's, as a magnet and a proving ground for Islamic extremists from Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries. (Italics were mine)
Wow, that shot that WWAD.

Maybe this is why Powerline's special Iraqi correspondent,LTC Repya, wrote into the Strib about the connections between Iraq and 9-11.

[to Powerline] Soldiers over here keep asking me why America has forgotten 9-11. I keep telling them that the liberal media won't let the American people see the images of the murdered and tortured Iraqis we find every day over here.

[to the Strib] Your editorial "Durbin's Message/US Must End Prisoner Abuse" proves beyond any doubt that the Star Tribune Editorial Staff has no idea of who we are fighting and why!
I get it!! It's not that Iraq/Saddam was connected to 9-11...it's that Iraq will be connected to a new 9-11.

Let's take a quick trip down memory hole lane.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The insurgency in Iraq is "in the last throes," Vice President Dick Cheney says, and he predicts that the fighting will end before the Bush administration leaves office.

In a wide-ranging interview Monday on CNN's "Larry King Live," Cheney cited the recent push by Iraqi forces to crack down on insurgent activity in Baghdad and reports that the most-wanted terrorist leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, had been wounded.

The vice president said he expected the war would end during President Bush's second term, which ends in 2009.
Why does the CIA hate Vice President Cheney?

The other babysitter

Rew and Smartie are indeed off to "the good life," but they hosted a lively and well attended Drinking Liberally last evening. Thanks to all who came, including the famous Mr. Sponge.

Rew tells me my beat this weekend is the Chick Angle. Well, nothing says "Chick Angle" better than some powerful fool man shooting his mouth off in a clueless manner and the object of his ignorance remaining graceful. Danica Patrick and Bernie Ecclestone provide this morning's example.

One for the road

If they wanted Mr. Sticks, why not just use Mr. Sticks?

I like Craig better.

Tag, I'm It!! Homework Assignment

REW has tagged me with a book meme. Normally, this ain't my bag. It is my policy over at Clever Peasantry that I don't do tags; however, I have made one exception in the past...for books. Sooooo...here are the five most important ones:

a- Candide, by Voltaire- I believe this to be the finest thing ever written. It is a perfect combination of humor, philosophy, filth, and grace. It challenges the philosopher with serious questions that are presented in a ridiculous manner and it challenges the bafoon with real problems in a language that only a true idiot can understand. Plus, I like earthquakes and theodicy.

b- The Stranger, by Albert Camus- I believe this to be the second finest thing ever written. No one really knows who they are until other people decide it for them. It also shows that many things can be bent in many different ways. Very nice. Very absurd.

c- Hedda Gabbler, by Henrik Ibsen- OK, this is a play, but I read it at least once a year. Ibsen was the master at dual-meaning dialogue...or double entendre for those who aren't as clumsy. Hedda is my favorite literary character of all time. I named a cat after her once. Ironically enough, the cat was quite pent up and it eventually went crazy and nearly died several times; once by a fractured skull. I think the cat was quite literally suicidal (Hedda the cat lacked the necessary digits that were needed in order to properly operate a gun like Hedda the person; suicide is a lot harder for kitties.)

d- Alexander Hamilton: A Biography, by Forrest McDonald- Hamilton is my favorite American of all time; an ambitious bastard who never realized that his true greatness was only achieved when his individual ambitions were tempered by an outside force (Washington). I think we Americans tend to romanticize individuality to such an extent that we forget why we need to rely on others; and that such a reliance is not always a weakness. McDonald's bio is still the best on the subject; much better than Chernow's book.

e- Life on the Mississippi, by Mark Twain- Another book that I read every year. Damn I wish I could write like that.

Honorable mentions:

1- "Inner Tube", by Hob Brown: This book is out of print and it is nearly impossible to find anymore. It is about TV. The main question is this: "Has TV has made us more apathetic or were we that way to begin with?" He also writes very, very well; one of those writers who creates his own language...and it works.

2- "Actual Air", by David Berman: Mr. Berman's poetry is some of the weirdest most wonderful stuff you will ever read. He is also lead singer of the band Silver Jews. You should check out the Joos. Buy this one.

There, go read these books.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

My First Power-Post; There Goes the Neighborhood

So the Power Liberals are headed off to Omaha to partake in "The Good Life". For those of you who haven't been to Nebraska, this is the slogan that greets you high above the 1-80 overpass as you cross over the river from Iowa. When you see this sign, you think to yourself, "Why yes, this is the good life." However, do not believe any the nonsense that your mind is telling you. Why not? I'll tell you: Most Nebraksans are tricky corn-fed inbreds and they should not be trusted (or touched without utensils). They know full well that you just spent the past 90 minutes driving through the most boring parts of Iowa (west of Des Moines). They know full well that you just passed through the armpit of Iowa, Counciltucky (more commonly known as Council Bluffs...a hellish landscape of casinos, trailer parks, gun shops and car dealerships.) After that garbage...yes, the home of the Woodman Tower (Ugliest Building in America™) is indeed the "Good Life."

I kid the good folks of Power Liberal. I have many fond memories of Omaha. College (Creighton) and career (Offutt AFB) treated me very well in Minneapolis' colder sibling. Omaha has the nation's 2nd finest zoo (after San Diego), finest college baseball stadium (Rosenblatt), best smoked tomato soup (McFosters), best independent brewery bar (Upstream), best non-football University (Creighton), best Jesuit University (Creighton), best bird-mascot University (Creighton), best University that nearly rhymes with "Peyton" (UN Omaha), best Czech eats (Bohemian Cafe), cheapest rich guy (Warren Buffett...I know where he lives), best cheapest rich guy's favorite steak house (Gorats), best steak house where I've eaten a steak with the cheapest rich guy (Gorats), best steak house where I paid for my own steak while eating with the cheapest rich guy (Gorats), best americana music scene/record label (Saddle Creek), best small-venue concert hall (Sokol), best super small-venue concert hall (tie...Ranch Bowl/Sokol Underground), stupidest convention center name (AKSARBEN), and best suburban German eats/Oktoberfest (Edelweiss in Bellevue).

In a very small way, the Sponge family misses the "Good Life" of Omaha, Nebraska. We were there for 3 years (our longest single station in the military) and we made many good friends. Plus, they have a Sonic. What the hell Minnesota!! It's time to get a frickin' Sonic. Mmmmmmm....Frito chili pie.

Anywho, thank you to the Power Liberals for letting me help take care of your site for a few days. Little do you know that I plan to ask you two to do the very same thing when the Sponge family heads back to Oklahoma for a week of family visitin' (in-law style) in early July.

Ahhhhh...Oklahoma...land of Sonic and Head Country BBQ (for those of you who haven't had Head Country BBQ, you need to get off your ass and order some. It is amazing. In fact, write Cub and tell them to place an order.)

I promise that this will be the last post about meaningless crap. Unless, of course, Tom Cruise does something crazy. I love that man!! Who-hooo!!

Let's Talk About Sex, Baby

From Yahoo:


The papers to be presented at the conference, which runs from Tuesday through Saturday, all deal in some way with society's squeamishness about sex. They cover such topics as abortion, transsexualism — and runaway brides.

Saskia Wieringa, the international association's president, studies sexual politics in Indonesia and likens some strict Muslim traditions, such as forcing women to cover their faces in public, to many of President Bush's conservative policies.

"They are both fighting against each other, but upholding the same kind of system," Wieringa said.

In Indonesia, people are shying away from liberal dress codes that were always part of the culture.

"Women used to go around bare-breasted," she said. "Now, there is a whole moral panic about the belly button that shouldn't be shown."

What Goes Around Comes Around and Around and Around

Gary has tagged me. The fact that he doesn't know I've already done this makes me cry, as I assumed he read me daily just as I do him.

*sigh*

I'm just going to link to my earlier tag here. However, I would like very much to see some of the responses of the others he tagged. VERY much...

UPDATE: Just noticed Sandy got me as well. It's official, I'm the token liberal. I will join gyou on the dark side once you build me a nifty black plastic suit complete with James Earl Jones voice modulator.

RE-UPDATE: Smartie suggested since I got two tags, I should pass them off onto our guest bloggers for the week. So there. They have a homework assignement.

It's good to be queen of Powerliberal Land. I'm suddenly starting to see a little of the appeal of the M.A.W.B. Squad manifesto.

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Ever wonder why...

The original Drinking Liberally guy never shows?

Too busy being famous.

You can go, but you have to promise to go to Lyle's after.

Calling all script kiddies

Mr. Fitzgerald is just asking for it now.

Buddhist Temple Fundraisers-Still Bad!

The All Seeing Eye points out the (surprise!) hypocrisy of the party that still complains about Gore and Buddhist temples while one of their major supporters is busy propping up North Korea.

So, will all the wingnuts now cancel their subscriptions to the Washington Times like they constantly threaten to do to the Strib and any other newspaper perceived as having a liberal bias? After all, here you have a paper run by someone who is actually working against the interests of this country. That seems a shade worse than printing editorials questioning administration policy. But I guess that's just my moral relativism at work, huh?

Forget German Shepherds

You really want to strike fear into the hearts of criminals? Try using Police Lions:

Police say three lions rescued a 12-year-old girl kidnapped by men who wanted to force her into marriage, chasing off her abductors and guarding her until police and relatives tracked her down in a remote corner of Ethiopia.

The men had held the girl for seven days, repeatedly beating her, before the lions chased them away and guarded her for half a day before her family and police found her, Sgt. Wondimu Wedajo said Tuesday by telephone from the provincial capital of Bita Genet, some 560 kilometers (348 miles) west of the capital, Addis Ababa.

"They stood guard until we found her and then they just left her like a gift and went back into the forest," Wondimu said, adding he did not know whether the lions were male or female.


See, here's the reason I'm a cat person.

Go Kos Go!

Number 17 ain't too shabby. You're as dangerous as Clinton.

Via Frat Boys, some people I never read have put together a list of the top 20 biggest people to "screw up America":

23) Sandra Day O'Connor (6)
23) Ruth Bader Ginsburg (6)
23) Maxine Waters (6)
21) Charles Rangel (7)
21) Al Gore (7)
17) David Souter (8)
17) Al Sharpton (8)
17) Markos Moulitsas Zuniga (8)
17) Bill Clinton (8)
16) Paul Krugman (9)
15) Noam Chomsky (10)
13) John McCain (11)
13) Robert Byrd (11)
11) Jessie Jackson (12)
11) Jimmy Carter (12)
10) Nancy Pelosi (13)
8) John Kerry (14)
8) Barbara Boxer (14)
7) Dick Durbin (17)
6) Hillary Clinton (19)
4) George Soros (23)
4) Harry Reid (23)
3) Ted Kennedy (24)
1) Michael Moore (26)
1) Howard Dean (26)

North Star Politics is back

Must have finally paid the pesky electric bill again.

Go read. Maybe he won't leave again.

Quote of the Day

"I can also keep elephants away by banging these two sticks together.

There.

What? You doubt me? You don't see any elephants around, do you?"


Find out what Fecke's talking about here.

I feel shame

I have just discovered via Pharyngula (who's link on his page doesn't work) that Fred Phelps is a registered democrat.

Ick.

Monday, June 20, 2005

This One Is For Both Sides

"If God did not exist, it would be necessary [for man] to invent him."
-Voltaire

"If the Nazis did not exist, it would be necessary for pundits to invent them."
-me

I trust I don't need to add links, you can all come up with your own examples.

Come on people, can we please have a moratorium on the Nazi references? It's getting more than a little sickening all around.

This week in Powerliberal Land

Smartie and I have to head back to Omaha this week, and have arranged for a few blogsitters to make sure you kids don't play with matches or drink the bleach under the sink.

MinnesotaObserver, a wonderful back-up for the All-Seeing Eye, has agreed to pop in and promises to be pithy and dry. (Seriously, she swore it, I have it on record somewhere.)

CleverSponge, local arch-nemisis of Swiftee and blogger at Clever Peasantry, has also decided to help us out. Luckily, we asked him before he got famous. Or, at least, we were planning to...the famous thing kind of scared us off. Should he manage to keep everyone in line, we will move him up to Drinking Buddies status. Which god knows he needs to improve his stats.

Smartie and I will be out from Wednesday evening though most of Monday. But we'll be sure to get our drink on before we go.

Inievitable, but tardy

Moses, King of all things Downing, gives a rundown of the righties trying to discredit the Downing Street Memos:

I think the right-wing bloggers are getting a little slow. They could smell something funny with the documents Dan Rather cited on 60 Minutes even before the show was over (something I still find a little suspicious). With Downing Street, though, it has taken the New Wingnut Media over a month and a half to suspect foul play.

Let It Go

Gov. Bush Seeks Another Inquiry in Schiavo Case

(Sorry about the NY Times link-registration required)

Gov. Jeb Bush asked a state prosecutor on Friday to investigate the circumstances of Terri Schiavo's collapse, saying a new autopsy report revealed a possible gap between when Ms. Schiavo fell unconscious and when her husband called paramedics.

"It's a significant question that during this entire ordeal was never brought up," Governor Bush told reporters in Tallahassee after faxing a letter to Bernie McCabe, the state attorney in Pinellas County, where Ms. Schiavo suffered extreme brain damage when her heart temporarily stopped beating in 1990.


So Jeb wants to reopen everything. To what end? Does he want to try Michael for manslaughter? I assume that would be the charge since, according to Jeb, Michael's actions (or lack thereof) lead ultimately to Terri's death.

And the new evidence that compels the governor to waste more time and energy on this? Must be pretty stunning, right? Not so much:

It was not clear on Friday how a new investigation could yield information that years of legal proceedings had failed to. Governor Bush acknowledged the difficulty of the task in his letter to Mr. McCabe but said it was worth pursuing.

"I understand that these events took place many years ago, and that you may not be able to collect all the relevant records and physical evidence," he said. "However, Mrs. Schiavo's family deserves to know anything that can be done to determine the cause and circumstances of her collapse 15 years ago has been done. The unanswered questions may be unanswerable, but the attempt should be made."


So, based on a couple of questions that ten years in court failed to answer, Jeb wants to drag this up again. Is this the Bush family monomania rearing its ugly head? Do they have a congenital inability to admit mistakes? And, I would think most importantly, does the State of Florida pretty much run itself? Because Jeb seems to spend an awful lot of time on these pet projects (Schivao, 13 year olds who want abortions, missing children, etc.) that have little to do with actually running the state.

Minnesotans, does any of this sound familiar? Isn't it great having a governor who's eyeing higher office? Balance the budget fairly? Pshaw. I've got more important things to worry about than this puny state.

So Do I. But I'm Not Telling Either...

CIA 'knows Bin Laden whereabouts'

The head of the US Central Intelligence Agency has said he has an "excellent idea" where Osama Bin Laden is hiding.

But CIA director Porter Goss did not say when the world's most wanted man would be caught, nor his location.


Yeah, right. "Oh, we know where he is, but we're not going to go get him." And why?

"When you go to the very difficult question of dealing with sanctuaries in sovereign states, you're dealing with a problem of our sense of international obligation, fair play."


That's a newfound worry for the Bush administration, isn't it? What happened to blowing up countries just on unfounded rumors that one of their agents might have been possibly could have been seen by someone talking to someone who could have been an agent of Al Queda? Now, when we "know" where Bin Laden himself is, were hesitant about going after him?

I don't buy it. Either Porter Goss is trying to up his profile in the administration by just making things up or Bin Laden is holed up somewhere that we don't have the strength to get him out of because all of our forces are tied up elsewhere.

Either way, it seems that this has to be a tad embarrassing for the administration. There have been a lot of remarks lately from administration officials contradicting one another (Cheney & Rumsfeld v. Gonzalez on Guantanamo) or from members of his own party challenging Bush's policies (none more forcefully than Walter "Freedom Fries" Jones).

Are these signs that the administration's strangle hold on all three branches of government is starting to weaken to the point where they can no longer force everyone to stay "on message"? Or could it be that various players are trying to cut the ties that bind them to a sinking president? Developing...

Sunday, June 19, 2005

Busy Bush

President Bush provided a video-taped message for the National Right to Life Convention that was held in Minnesota this week.

I wonder if anyone in the audience considered that he was in town at the time stumping on Medicaid, but didn't work in time to talk to his flock in person.

Maybe he couldn't get from one suburb to the next becasue of the traffic.

CWFA Says "What a Drag"

Whenever I think the Concerned Women for America can't top themselves, they write a new press release.

Indiana may soon begin hiring men in dresses in order to satisfy the governor’s affirmative action plan. That’s a possibility because of an April 26, 2005, policy statement issued by Republican Gov. Mitchell E. Daniels Jr.

Why bother weekend blogging

when some people seem to do it so much better...

I'll just go back to shopping now. Gotta, um, keep the economy moving. Yeah, that's it...

Friday, June 17, 2005

It's a Start...

Ex-Tyco CEO Kozlowski found guilty

One down, a couple of hundred other CEO's looting their companies and screwing over their workers to go.

Seriously, people!

I love Minnesota as much as the next girl, but our quarter is ugly. Get over it an move on.

You all know who you are.

Fear the Cheese!

No, not the Packers. The molten hot cheese bublin' in the middle of a Juicy Lucy.

I thought I'd had quite a few of these babies. Turns out, I'm only a neophyte in the realm of the Juicy. Without regard to the danger to their arteries, the guys over at Doodledee are working on putting together what may be the world's first comprehensive directory of Juicy Lucys. Truly, a noble endeavor.

Found via MNSpeak.

Speeches Are Made Here.

Tom, the newly wildly successful proprietor of Functional Ambivalent has invented a new metric to measure the clarity and/or brevity (amazing how the two tend to go hand in hand) of speech.

REW, blessed as she is with the gift of pith, would probably score pretty high. I'm guessing she'd be in the .8 range.

Considering my inability to write a sentence shorter than thirty or forty words (this sentence clearly illustrating that point) I would have to guess my "RQC" score would be pretty low. I'd say in the area of .1. (Maybe even less if your score is adversely affected by number of parentheticals per paragraph.) (See what I mean?)

Still and all, I'm definitely not playing in the same league as an Italian/North Korean joint legal venture.

The "Found Money" Strategy

Joe Mayo over at the First Ring takes a look at the latest Republican state budget proposal and finds a lot to like. (other than racino)

Perhaps this is the partisan divide here, but when I first looked at this "solution" I was incredulous that a senator could make these kind of statements and still get reelected.

As far as I can tell, the solution boils down to a quarter of the money needed to fill the budget hole will come from a casino nobody wants and that won't be approved, and the other three fourths will come from hoped for revenue based on a few short term numbers that have seen an unexpected uptick lately.

It seems the height of irresponsibility to be basing three fourths of your state's long term budget on a few numbers which have seen a sudden increase when there is no indication that that increase will be sustained. It's like finding a $20 bill in the street and then imagining everything you're going to be able to buy when you find your next $20.

Joe says that this "brings the total to two Republican offers and zero DFL offers (that doesn’t include the bogus offers from the DFL that offer no viable solution." But that seems a little ironic. Does the above sound like a "viable solution" to you?

Under T.Paw the MN Republicans have blown so much smoke over their budgets that they'd be banned in Minneapolis, but even for them this is taking it to the next level. They're not just raiding funds and deferring payments into the future, they're actually now counting entirely on money that the State might never have.

I hope the State's bond rating isn't up for review any time soon. It seems to me that we're heading into "junk" territory full speed ahead.

UPDATE: The MNPolitics Guru has some thoughts similar to mine on this issue.

Friday Morning Cat Incredulity


"President Bush said what?" Posted by Hello

Brewing at DumpBachmann

Eva has been busy over in her corner of the world. Be sure to check out her post on Bachmann's connection to Tony Perkins of the who is connected to the Council of Concerned Citizens, as well as Bachmann's funding from Minnesota Observer's favorite King of Stink.

This almost makes me forgive her for telling me that the only DFL candidate for the 6th is running as a pro-Marriage Ammendment, "Pro-Life" candidate.

UPDATE: Fixed my error. I blame early coffee hijinks.

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Sigh

Mass. governor to back amendment to ban gay marriage, civil unions


"If the question is, 'Do you support gay marriage or civil unions?' I'd say neither," Romney said last year. "If they said you have to have one or the other, that Massachusetts is going to have one or the other, then I'd rather have civil unions than gay marriage. But I'd rather have neither."


Just. Sigh.

Not sure what to make of this...

U.S. considers closing Guantánamo

Even if you don't think anything untoward is going on in Guantanamo surely it's apparent to everyone by now that it's become an international embarrasment for this country. Which is a nice way of saying it's causing us more problems than it's solving.

I'm just a little surprised by this news, coming as does so soon after Rumsfeld and Cheney both said it would remian open. Gonzales strikes me as pretty much a company man, so if he's making a speech contrary to previously stated administration policy I have to believe that must mirror a shift in that policy.

Worth keeping an eye on, anyway...

I Can't Wait Until All The Children Are Above Average

Instead of just meriting a "D".

Does anyone still think NCLB was a good idea? Is there anyone out there who couldn't see grade inflation as one of the inevitable consequences of this law?

And on a related note, I thought conservatives hated the Dept. of Education. When did they decide that more federal control of schools was a good thing? As soon as the right people were doing the controlling?

Morning Carnival of hte Slightly Different than Usual

Being is a slightly good mood and a little less of a rush than usual, I decided to walk to work today (no, I am not going to put up a playlist here).

First I passed three fishermen in the crook of the river in between St. Anthony Main and Nicollet Island Inn. They waved, and I waved back from the bridge. As someone said last night at DL, "Yup, the river's flowing. Flowing fast." But they were jolly had having fun, although they yelled that they hadn't caught anything yet.

Nicollet Mall was dressed in it's Farmer's Market finery. I was looking at some flowers when a brigade of Segways came roaming by, doing loops and something vaguely resembling wheelies. One person had rainbows on her wheels, making any glance turn into a moment of nauseusness.

I headed in to grab a bagle and saw a woman struggling down a street with a load of signs. The only one I could read was "Enforce the Humphrey Hawkins Law."

Just another summer day downtown.

In Other News...

Fake DVD seizures up 41% on 2004

The Industry Trust for IP Awareness now estimates the value of the black market DVD trade - worth £600m in 2004 - to exceed £1bn within three years.

Case studies suggest increased links between piracy and organised crime.


Seriously, folks, is anybody surprised by this bit of information? Since when have ham-fisted attempts at prohibition actually done anything but help criminals?

or,

In Other News: Fake DVD seizures up 41% on 2004
In a Totally Unrelated Story: Fake DVD Profits Up 41%

I'm Confused...(part 2)

Why do Republicans say that people with no chance of recovery must be kept on life support indefinitely...but want to cancel healthcare coverage for everyone else?

(Part 1 is here)

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Here we go again...

The All Seeing Eye continues to add everyone as a guest blogger but me....

Not that I'm jealous or anything.

Okay, maybe a little.

Why Does The CP Hate Jobs?

Don't they understand that the only way we can hope to grow Minnesota's economy is to give more money to the rich and hope they give us a little of it back? Clearly, the problem with the state budget is "middle class entitlements" (Thank you David Strom).

Ignore the man behind the curtain:

Minnesota Republicans will have a hard time arguing that the temporary tax hike is unfair. In recent years, the share of the state budget paid by the wealthiest Minnesotans has shrunk dramatically, according to a City Pages analysis of state Department of Revenue figures. In 2002, the top 10 percent of taxpayers paid a lesser share of their income in state and local taxes than many middle- and upper-middle-class families. And the top 1 percent paid the lowest effective tax rate of all. Meanwhile, middle-income Minnesotans, those making $35,684 to $102,426 in 2002, are paying the highest percentages.

Oh, Well if a FEDERAL Study Shows it Works

How can I doubt them?

New Federal Government Study Shows Abstinence Education Works

Was Cooney involved?

Moses In The Morning

Because, really, we could all use a good laugh to start the day, right? So head on over to Yowling for a good one.

Seriously, though, I'd like to give Moses a hand for doing everything in his power to keep the Downing Street Memo story afloat, if you haven't been following his coverage you really should. I know lying to get the country into war isn't as serious as getting a blowjob in the oval office, but it seems like it deserves some attention.

Drinking Liberally June 15th

Rainy Days and neo-cons always get me down...

Maple Grove is getting President Bush and a select group of pre-approved audience members. But at Drinking Liberally Minneapolis, we have no screening, we don't kick you out for your bumper-sticker, and we don't edit meeting notes if we don't like their findings (possibly because we don't take notes).

Join us for a beer, some good conversation, and no pre-staged questions.

Wednesday, June 15th
6 - 9 PM
Liquor Lyle's (back room)
2021 Hennepin Ave. South

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

GOP means smaller, more efficient government

I like the GOP. They share everything.

Via Patrick.

The Book of Hinderaker

Yea, verily, I went unto Legal Fiction and I read "The Book of Hinderaker" and it was good stuff.


Thanks to Luke over at the New Patriots for pointing this out.

Of torture and gitmo and gulags

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.

At the request of the All Seeing Eye, I am linking to this screedblog. Read it and then come back and we'll discuss. I'll wait...

The screed linked above is pretty representative of the kind of pro-torture wingnut arguments I've been seeing a lot of lately. As far as I can tell, these arguments boil down to two main points:

1) It might be torture, but it's necessary to save lives and prevent future attacks. (ie "Better them than us")
2) It isn't really torture because the other side (or the Soviets, or whoever) does so much worse that there is simply no comparison.

Okay, since the wingnuts are so fond of their WWII analogies in RE: the WOT I'll offer them a couple of my own.

The first argument, viewed in the WWII light is not only absurd, but twisted. I don't think anyone would seriously argue that the world is in more danger now than it was from the Axis. Nor do I think anyone really believes that Al Queda has high level spies in the government and military of the US and its allies as was widely believed in WWII. Yet even with the odds so much higher in the 40s, and with so much more potential information to be gleaned, the Allies never tortured their captured Nazi prisoners for information and certainly they never made it official policy. Why not? Thousands of people were dying every day. If torturing a few scum-sucking Nazis was the price we had to pay to help stop them, then so be it, right?

For "The Greatest Generation", however, that idea, that cold calculus of lives vs. morals, was abhorrent. That was the kind of barbarity they were fighting against. Indeed, the now much scoffed at Geneva Conventions arose from the shock of World War II and were intended to prevent the kind of petty atrocities that we are now looking for ways to justify. In just sixty years we've moved from the country writing the laws against torture to the country looking for the loopholes in those laws. Terrorism is evil. Torture is evil. Is the mass murder of 3,000 people morally equivalent to beating a prisoner? No. But they both read from the same side of the ledger. They are both debits from humanity. We could win World War II without staining our hands. We can win the WOT without sacrificing what makes us better than this.

Which brings me to the second point. The, "oh yeah, well they cut off the heads of their prisoners and we don't so we're better than them" argument. To continue with the WWII analogy, the Germans had mass-murder concentration camps and the Japanese had terribly inhumane prison camps and murdered countless Chinese during the Rape of Nanking, just to name a few of their abhorrent acts. We were fighting to end these abuses and liberate these camps. By today's logic, then, the Japanese-American interment camps were perfectly acceptable (indeed, some wingnuts have made just that argument). Actually, this sad apologia for evil doesn't go nearly far enough. If we thought the Japanese people we rounded up were a potential threat, why not torture them? Why not round up and torture recent German immigrants? They might have information, or they might be enemy agents. It all makes sense using this logic. We might be rounding up and torturing our own citizens, but hey, at least we're not gassing them, right? What the Germans are doing is so much worse that our hands are clean...on a relative scale. Right?

I won't even get into the cognitive dissonance of the right wingers, who constantly argue for moral absolutes, trying to shade the torture argument with so much gray that you can barely see what they're talking about. A poke isn't as bad as a slap isn't as bad as a punch isn't as bad as a rifle butt in the chin isn't as bad as broken fingers isn't as bad as ruptured organs and individual executions which aren't as bad as mass murder and genocide, right? I'm not necessarily arguing it's a slippery slope, but once you begin with this logic how do you stop? If you are trying to prevent a terrorist attack and you can justify poking and slapping, how can you not authorize full out beatings? They're still not nearly as bad as what you're trying to stop. And what if there are two terrorists who have the knowledge to stop the attack? Is it okay to shoot one in the head in front of the other in order to scare the other into cooperation? The "justify torture/moral equivalence game" has only one rule. Once you start playing you've already lost. You've lost what it was you were fighting to protect in the first place, and you've lost your moral high ground and you've lost the war. While you might prevent an attack here or there, you've virtually guaranteed more attacks in the future and more paranoia and more torture and more attacks. Is terrorism evil? Yes. But just as you can't guarantee security with paranoia, you can't beat evil by becoming evil.

Where's the Outrage? Not Here.

First, I owe Mr. Sticks an apology. I once stated that he had written the most puffy poo piece of newspaper ever created when he interviewed David Strom. Little did I know how quickly he could be surpassed.

I'm supposed to be outraged by the fact that Kersten took a column, which requires absolutely no facts, and used it to try and counter-argue copious reports that were in the news which were written by reporters who actually use facts to base their stories.

But I'm not. After all, hasn't the GIMEC been telling us for ages that it is the way that columnists work? Haven't they said repeatedly that Nick Coleman can only get away with his unmitigated libel simply because he's a columnist and can write whatever he wants without needed to use pesky "facts"?

Kersten's work is obviously rated on how many letters to the editor the newspaper receives. And she is doing a bang-up job. It's kind of a shame, since I really did enjoy her column on the historical society, but that just doesn't generate letters like her hot-button columns do.

I have a confession to make, and it's probably going to get me thrown off Eva's blogroll. I want Michele Bachmann to get the nomination for the 6th. This is just dress-rehearsal. I can't even begin to imagine what lunacy her campaign will take if she actually had to run this race. Imagine her with reporters around her 24-7 to take note of every tiny move she makes.

So, keep going, Ms. Kersten. Try to make her appear victimized, demonized, underappreciated. Because Michele Bachmann has just gotten started, and I'm looking forward to seeing her under real pressure.

I would also like to note that I am looking forward to your next column, "Tim Pawlenty, Misunderstood Financial Genius." But stay away from David Strom, Mr. Sticks already staked his claim.

Monday, June 13, 2005

Does That Mean She's Working Now?

This headline struck me as wrong:

Report: Paris Hilton to retire in 2 years

I'm Confused

Why do conservatives keep pointing out that polls show majority support for an anti-gay marriage amendment as a reason to support it...while fighting against abortion rights which have consistently enjoyed majority support for decades?

The Tintinabulation of the Polls

Gallup has been trying to get a hold of someone in our house for about a week, but Smartie never answers the phone when they call. Saturday, I picked up on a number I thought was the hinterlands of Minnesota but was instead a Harris pollster calling for some input. I hung up on him pretty quickly, since it was a Saturday, I was in a hurry, and I couldn't understand a word he was saying.

About a half an hour after Mr. Harris called, Gallup called again. Feeling guilty about the way I treated Mr. Harris, I decided to go through the full 20 minutes with Ms. Gallup. Once, long ago and far away (well, two states away, anyway) I too was a summer pollster, and there is nothing more frustrating. Normally, I pretend I work for a polling place, too, since they can't poll you but can count it as a completed poll. But this time I decided to run the gamut.

Normally, a pollster tries to hide what it is he's actually pulling for, and it's a fun game to try and discern the true intent. Smartie once got asked to act as a test subject for a new pilot sitcom for NBC. It was pretty obvious once they started asking questions that they really were trying to figure out how effective their commercials were. (And those jerks never did give us the grocery shopping spree they promised afterwards). But Gallup seemed to be a straightforward, quality of life in Minneapolis type of poll. How are the parks, how is the arts, how's the transportation, is the city getting better or worse.

An hour later, the phone rings. It's a pollster. "May I ask how you got my number?" I ask him. "You're the third one to call today." He's flustered, I feel guilty, so I partake in another poll, not realizing that this is going to be the longest 40 minutes of my life.

We start with the standards: "How do you rate the job the president is doing? Excellent, good, fair or poor?" "Poor." "How do you rate the job Donald Rumsfeld is doing? Excellent, good, fair or poor." "Poor." "How do you rate the job Tom Delay is doing?" "Is there something lower than poor?" "No, I'm sorry, poor is all I have." "Okay, then poor."

Then it gets odd...

We veer a little tangentially, with some questions that appear to be about losing privacy through the Patriot Act. Then a weird one:

"Name two companies who have good reputations."

"What kind of companies?" I ask.

"You know, places that people work."

"You mean, just companies? No particular industry, no choosing out of a few?"

Then he asks for two with bad reputations.

"Halliburton and Wal-mart" I answer immediately.

"What new sources do you trust? How much news do you get off the internet? Do you approve of PR people putting things in news? Do you own a plasma TV?"

At this point, I kind of want to get back to those privacy questions from earlier, so I can tell them I strongly disapprove of overly intrusive polls.

But still I don't hang up. I've been at the other end of really long polls. You get a fat bonus for each one you finish, usually because most people hang up about 5 minutes from the end.

When we finally get there, it turns out I have participate on a Harris poll. This guy might possibly have been the same one I hung up on earlier, afraid to tell me it was him again on the possible change I would just refuse. So I think we are now done with the polling, or, at the very least, are no longer being stalked by them, and we can pick up the phone with abandon.

But I still want a choice lower than poor for Delay.

Saturday, June 11, 2005

Right-phasia

Right-phasia: Partial or total loss of the ability to comprehend and accept flaws in Republican candidates while at the same time instantly believing any and every ridiculous rumor about Democrats.

They think that Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam. They must be suffering from right-phasia. -or- You'd have to have a bad case of right-phasia to believe those swift boat liars.

This one is for my new fans at the M.A.W.B. Squad. I retort because I care. ;-)

Bonus: Saturday Morning Cat Fight


Battle Posted by Hello


CATS!!! Posted by Hello


We have a winner! Posted by Hello