Minnesota is now officially down to one senator, with Norm Coleman's term expiring earlier today. Coleman's team has already
admitted that they will not win unless the properly rejected absentee ballots they handpicked are reintroduced to the pile, and are preparing for a lawsuit, which is still likely to not change the end results. Which leaves one question -- why is Coleman stalling?
Originally, the idea was that Coleman hoped to prolong the recount in order to hit a point where Gov. Pawlenty would be able to appoint him as senator to a vacant seat. But both Pawlenty's 2012 aspirations and a Democratic-lead senate that won't likely declare the seat empty, just contested, makes that highly improbable. A PR war is being wages across the television, newspapers and blogs, and it's hard to find a anyone who thinks that this is improving Coleman's image. So again, why the desperate tactics?
Obviously, the goal of not losing his seat is forefront, but something else may be at play...a 2014 rematch. Keeping the seat vacant for as long as possible is the biggest benefit the MNGOP can gain from the recount. To keep stalling will make it impossible for Franken to be sworn in as senator with the other freshmen, making him the most junior of all senators. Continue stalling, and Franken misses all of the prime committee appointments the other senators will be jockying for during the early days of the session. Close every door open to Franken at the beginning of 2009. If they rely on the fact that voters have short memories, the ugliness of the recount will seem less bitter, but Coleman, or any of his cronies can then come back swinging when Franken's up for re-election, pointing out how ineffective he was for Minnesota.
Would the GOP really put the future of Minnesota for the next 6 years on the line to set up regaining a seat? Would it really surprise you?
(Theory actually that of Smartie, who is the evil mastermind, but he's too lazy to write so you got my rendition instead.)